Delay Reduction Efforts in Three Juvenile Courts
نویسندگان
چکیده
To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally-funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. The causes of delay in the youth justice system are complex. No single approach is likely to be effective in restoring the timeliness of the process. Researchers have successfully linked court delays to a wide range of factors, including resources and workload, jurisdiction size, case characteristics (e.g., offense type and severity), various procedural factors, management and organization, and the informal norms and values of a court. More research is needed, however, on the factors that facilitate or impede the timely processing of delinquency cases. The literature from criminal (adult) courts may be of limited value in understanding youth justice delays, as the individualized approach of juvenile court proceedings is more complicated and often takes more time at intake, detention, adjudication, and disposition. There are two basic approaches to controlling processing delays in the youth justice system: 1) managerial; and 2) legal/professional. The first approach is probably most important. It is essential to confront the organizational elements that contribute to delay. Unlike adult defendants in criminal courts, juveniles do not have a Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial under the U.S. Constitution. A few states have provided something close to juvenile speedy trial rights for juveniles using statutes, court rules, or both. Other states have formally endorsed various administrative standards for the timely processing of juvenile cases. These standards are seldom mandatory, however, and wide variations remain within and across jurisdictions in juvenile delinquency case processing time. This study reviews the literature on court processing delay and the types of delay that most often affect delinquency cases in juvenile and family courts. It places the concept of court delay in a legal, social, and organizational context and describes the wide range of approaches used to prevent or control unwanted delay, including legislation, court rules, and professional standards. The analysis also describes the results of three case studies conducted in juvenile courts in the jurisdictions were selected because they each used a different approach to controlling and reducing unwanted juvenile court delays and they were all regarded as effective by their peers, according to a series of interviews conducted by the researchers with juvenile court leaders …
منابع مشابه
Responsibilities and effectiveness of the juvenile court in handling dependency cases.
The juvenile court's role in handling child abuse and neglect cases changed and expanded greatly after the passage of the federal Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act in 1980 and following the enactment of many similar state laws. These federal and state "permanency planning" laws require child welfare agencies to make reasonable efforts to avoid the break-up of families, where safe and pr...
متن کاملThe Effectiveness of Programs Tested in Juvenile Drug Courts
The effectiveness of treatment programs used in juvenile drug courts within the United States is often questioned. The two research articles that will be discussed tested two different treatment programs in hopes that they would lead to more favorable outcomes than the programs currently in place. of South Carolina. They conducted a study in six, randomly selected drug courts in the United Stat...
متن کاملThe future of the juvenile court: promising new directions.
The juvenile court of the future will be a viable, but changed, institution largely because of society's need to hold parents accountable for their children's well-being and youths accountable for their actions. The author describes three current trends in juvenile court which will continue to impact the court in the future. First, more jurisdictions will refine and streamline their court struc...
متن کاملOffice of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
As an alternative to traditional juvenile courts, juvenile drug courts attempt to provide substance abuse treatment, sanctions, and incentives to rehabilitate nonviolent drug-involved youth, empower families to support them in this process, and prevent recidivism. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) sponsored a multisite study of juvenile drug courts to examine the...
متن کاملParens Patriae and Dispositions in Juvenile Courts
This paper assesses the parens patriae orientation, which is often considered to beat the core of the operation of juvenile courts, and discovers that existing ideas concerning its role must be revised. In opposition to common theory it appears that parens patriae at best shares influence with a number of other orientations in juvenile courts, and may even no longer exist as a distinct, unified...
متن کامل